<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things that annoy me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frederickding.com/posts/2009/03/things-that-annoy-me-23252/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frederickding.com/posts/2009/03/things-that-annoy-me-23252/</link>
	<description>News, technology, life, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:57:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: required</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickding.com/posts/2009/03/things-that-annoy-me-23252/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickding.com/?p=252#comment-386</guid>
		<description>I strongly agree with the brown edit.

For the record, I think you are the only person who doesn&#039;t like getting high marks easily. For most people, having easy bonuses is great! They help you focus less on earning marks (because it&#039;s much easier to), so you can spend more time actually learning the material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly agree with the brown edit.</p>
<p>For the record, I think you are the only person who doesn&#8217;t like getting high marks easily. For most people, having easy bonuses is great! They help you focus less on earning marks (because it&#8217;s much easier to), so you can spend more time actually learning the material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickding.com/posts/2009/03/things-that-annoy-me-23252/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickding.com/?p=252#comment-384</guid>
		<description>If the bonus questions are of a higher caliber, then by all means, introduce them as a way of allowing very bright students to redeem any other mistakes they may have made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the bonus questions are of a higher caliber, then by all means, introduce them as a way of allowing very bright students to redeem any other mistakes they may have made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickding.com/posts/2009/03/things-that-annoy-me-23252/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickding.com/?p=252#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Interesting.

I think the situation I was &lt;em&gt;intending&lt;/em&gt; to describe is the easy likelihood of getting over perfect. When it&#039;s out of 100 and you have a number of bonus questions, it&#039;s not necessarily hard to get over perfect. The education system&#039;s marking numbers indicate that a level 4 is 80–100, I believe… so giving marks that are &gt;100 are sort of unnecessarily high.

Balance that with the fact that &lt;em&gt;not all teachers do that&lt;/em&gt;, and you have students in one class who have an easier time achieving a high mark compared with students in another class who do not have the benefit of bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Interesting.</p>
<p>I think the situation I was <em>intending</em> to describe is the easy likelihood of getting over perfect. When it&#8217;s out of 100 and you have a number of bonus questions, it&#8217;s not necessarily hard to get over perfect. The education system&#8217;s marking numbers indicate that a level 4 is 80–100, I believe… so giving marks that are >100 are sort of unnecessarily high.</p>
<p>Balance that with the fact that <em>not all teachers do that</em>, and you have students in one class who have an easier time achieving a high mark compared with students in another class who do not have the benefit of bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: required</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickding.com/posts/2009/03/things-that-annoy-me-23252/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickding.com/?p=252#comment-382</guid>
		<description>I see what you mean. Yeah, that is really annoying, I suppose. Or, it would be annoying, if it ever happened. I&#039;ve never had a teacher mean enough to do something like that, thankfully.

&quot;an evaluation with required questions that become optional; for instance, questions 101–119 becoming ‘bonus’ questions when nothing specifically makes them harder or more suitable as bonuses&quot;

This seems like a positive situation as well -- realizing you have 19 fewer questions you have to do. Unless they become &quot;bonus&quot; AFTER the actual exam, but even then -- you get the marks either way. Isn&#039;t this exactly the situation I described in the above comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you mean. Yeah, that is really annoying, I suppose. Or, it would be annoying, if it ever happened. I&#8217;ve never had a teacher mean enough to do something like that, thankfully.</p>
<p>&#8220;an evaluation with required questions that become optional; for instance, questions 101–119 becoming ‘bonus’ questions when nothing specifically makes them harder or more suitable as bonuses&#8221;</p>
<p>This seems like a positive situation as well &#8212; realizing you have 19 fewer questions you have to do. Unless they become &#8220;bonus&#8221; AFTER the actual exam, but even then &#8212; you get the marks either way. Isn&#8217;t this exactly the situation I described in the above comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickding.com/posts/2009/03/things-that-annoy-me-23252/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickding.com/?p=252#comment-381</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re exactly right. (and even that situation sometimes irritates me)

What I really meant to say was this: if you got all of the questions from 101–119 right but questions #91–100 wrong, then removing those 19 questions would make your score 90.0% rather than 92.4%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re exactly right. (and even that situation sometimes irritates me)</p>
<p>What I really meant to say was this: if you got all of the questions from 101–119 right but questions #91–100 wrong, then removing those 19 questions would make your score 90.0% rather than 92.4%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeegedeer</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickding.com/posts/2009/03/things-that-annoy-me-23252/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>zeegedeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickding.com/?p=252#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Ha! This is funny; as I&#039;m reading this I can tell which &quot;individuals&quot; you&#039;re referring to. GEE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! This is funny; as I&#8217;m reading this I can tell which &#8220;individuals&#8221; you&#8217;re referring to. GEE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: required</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickding.com/posts/2009/03/things-that-annoy-me-23252/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickding.com/?p=252#comment-379</guid>
		<description>&quot;taking questions off after the evaluation is written; for instance, an exam out of 119 becoming out of 100 — in that case, every loss of a mark is much greater in terms of percentage&quot;

I don&#039;t see what you mean. If you scored, say, 89/119, you&#039;d have less than 75% on that exam; if they reduce the total to 100, your mark goes all the way up to 89%. You will never be worse off; maybe I&#039;m misinterpreting how your marks were changed?

Oh, I got a great idea! There&#039;s also something else you should add! ... never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;taking questions off after the evaluation is written; for instance, an exam out of 119 becoming out of 100 — in that case, every loss of a mark is much greater in terms of percentage&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see what you mean. If you scored, say, 89/119, you&#8217;d have less than 75% on that exam; if they reduce the total to 100, your mark goes all the way up to 89%. You will never be worse off; maybe I&#8217;m misinterpreting how your marks were changed?</p>
<p>Oh, I got a great idea! There&#8217;s also something else you should add! &#8230; never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.frederickding.com @ 2010-09-09 14:09:48 by W3 Total Cache -->